nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equinix
From: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog () radu-adrian feurdean net>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 21:01:56 +0100
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, at 17:10, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote:
Hi Drew, You're probably best off ordering those crossconnects through the Equinix portal, then you can choose the exact positions for the order that goes to the facility rather than relying on a human to transcribe them correctly from your PDF.
Hi, I used to have issues with them at $job[-1]. At some point I had an "explanation" that they will NOT deliver XCos on ports that already have a cable plugged "in order not to cause disruptions". So much for precabled positions.... At some point it was also clear that their records (both their portal and their "other/non-official" records) were pretty far from being correct. The best part was when I ordered ONE XCo de-installed an I got TWO (the extra one a backbone link). Everything done via portal. Paris (FR/EU) area. Things seems a little better now, but as far as I can remember, things happen in "waves" there. Actually there's much more to say about them but for today it's enough. -- R-A.F.
Current thread:
- Equinix Drew Weaver (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Clayton Zekelman (Dec 05)
- RE: Equinix Drew Weaver (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Martijn Schmidt via NANOG (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Grzegorz Janoszka (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Paul Zugnoni via NANOG (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Dec 06)
- RE: Equinix Drew Weaver (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Clayton Zekelman (Dec 05)