nanog mailing list archives
Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 19:26:09 +0200
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 19:14, Rob Foehl <rwf () loonybin net> wrote:
Support claims that it was a mistake, but it's also been 15+ months and it's pretty deliberate behavior. Draw your own conclusions...
TTL decrement issues are fairly common across multiple vendors and hw, can be sw can be hw limit. Common issues for example is if MPLS egress PE receives explicit null labeled packet, it may not be able to decrement TTL. I may lack in imagination, but I struggle to envision a situation where people decided to do this and then decided to be sneaky peaky about it. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS, (continued)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Nimrod Levy (Dec 11)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Javier J (Dec 11)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Peter Beckman (Dec 12)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Javier J (Dec 13)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Warren Kumari (Dec 13)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Stephen Frost (Dec 11)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Saku Ytti (Dec 11)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 11)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Dec 11)
- RE: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Aaron Gould (Dec 12)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Javier J (Dec 12)