nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE our of IPv4
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 16:40:21 -0800
On Dec 3, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> wrote: On Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:58:59 -0800, FREDERICK BAKER said:I think he is saying that companies like Reliance JIO have started with a /22 of IPv4 and a /32 (or more) of IPv6,As I said - you need IPv4 space to dual-stack. How does Reliance do this without any v4 address space?
They have a very small amount, and do CGN, the same as anyone else. If that's what you took away from the APNIC measurements, you missed the story, though.
Current thread:
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4, (continued)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Aled Morris via NANOG (Dec 04)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Large Hadron Collider (Dec 05)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fernando Gont (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fernando Gont (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Brandon Martin (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
- Message not available
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fred Baker (Dec 03)