nanog mailing list archives
Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 02:25:51 +0000
But why do you think creating an out of band verification channel and separate port is going to work for this? There is plenty of local policy available as well to mandate that tls be negotiated with a set of allowed ciphers and prohibit others —srs ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan <giri () dombox org> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 7:43 AM To: Doug Royer Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Hello Doug, it's happening in ietf-smtp. This is my first proposal. So haven't created the I-D yet. I'm not sure how to create one. That's why I published my proposal in the medium. Please see the medium link I posted earlier. Thanks. On Sat, Jan 12, 2019, 6:46 AM Doug Royer <douglasroyer () gmail com<mailto:douglasroyer () gmail com> wrote: On 1/11/19 10:38 AM, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote:
Hello NANOG, Belated new year wishes. I would like to gather some feedback from you all. I'm trying to propose two things to the Internet Standard and it's related to SMTP. (1) STARTTLS downgrade protection in a dead simple way (2) SMTPS (Implicit TLS) on a new port (26). This is totally optional. I posted my proposal in IETF mailing list. I got very good feedback there. Some support my proposal. Many are against it.
What is the IETF draft name? Which IETF mailing list did this discussion happen on? -- Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US http://goo.gl/yrxJTu ) DouglasRoyer () gmail com<mailto:DouglasRoyer () gmail com> 714-989-6135
Current thread:
- SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Michael Thomas (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Doug Royer (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Brandon Martin (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Jan 11)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 11)