nanog mailing list archives
Re: really amazon?
From: Richard Williams via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:36:08 +0000 (UTC)
To contact AWS SES about spam or abuse the correct email address is abuse () amazonaws com
On Wednesday, July 31, 2019, 9:53:59 AM EDT, Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> wrote:
Yes, this is egregious, but on the other hand even when the abuse
reporting mechanisms are working my experience has been that they
emit no response (other than -- maybe -- boilerplate) and take no
action, so it's not terribly surprising.
---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?), (continued)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Steve Pointer (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Joe Provo (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Robert McKay (Jul 30)
- Not noreply autoresponder (WAS: really amazon?) Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Richard Williams via NANOG (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Brian J. Murrell (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)