nanog mailing list archives
Postmaster@
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem () rellim com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:44:29 -0700
Yo All! Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ? Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the rest of us? RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 gem () rellim com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin Begin forwarded message: Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 01:38:16 +0000 From: The Outlook.com Team <postmaster () outlook com> To: <gem () rellim com> Subject: Fw: gem : rellim541 This email address is not monitored. Please visit http://postmaster.outlook.com for information about sending email to Outlook.com, including troubleshooting information. If you are an Outlook.com user please visit http://answers.microsoft.com/ to learn more about our services, find answers to your questions, and share your feedback. Sincerely, Outlook.com Team Microsoft One Microsoft Way. Redmond, WA 98052, USA. Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our online Privacy Statement at http://privacy.microsoft.com
Attachment:
_bin
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Postmaster@ Gary E. Miller (Jun 14)
- Re: Postmaster@ Mel Beckman (Jun 14)
- Re: Postmaster@ Niels Bakker (Jun 15)
- Re: Postmaster@ bzs (Jun 15)
- Re: Postmaster@ Scott Christopher (Jun 15)
- Re: Postmaster@ Mark Milhollan (Jun 15)
- Re: Postmaster@ William Herrin (Jun 15)
- Re: Postmaster@ Matt Corallo (Jun 16)
- Re: Postmaster@ Mel Beckman (Jun 14)