nanog mailing list archives
Re: provider email maintenance standard
From: Doug Royer <douglasroyer () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:53:36 -0600
Why not submit this as a draft to the IETF and make it an official extension?
On 6/17/19 7:25 AM, Martin Pels wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/maintnote/ On 17/06/19 15:14, Andrew Dampf wrote:Hello nanog, I've heard second-hand there is an existing standard for provider maintenance emails that should be followed in the form of a calendar attachment, but I can't seem to find any information on it. Can anyone help me with the following: 1. Does this standard exist? If so, is there somewhere I can read more about it? 2. How many providers follow this standard? Thanks!
-- Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US) Douglas.Royer () gmail com 714-989-6135
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- provider email maintenance standard Andrew Dampf (Jun 17)
- Re: provider email maintenance standard Martin Pels (Jun 17)
- Re: provider email maintenance standard Matt Harris (Jun 17)
- Re: provider email maintenance standard Job Snijders (Jun 17)
- Re: provider email maintenance standard Jay Hanke (Jun 18)
- RE: provider email maintenance standard Erik Sundberg (Jun 18)
- Re: provider email maintenance standard Matt Harris (Jun 17)
- Re: provider email maintenance standard Martin Pels (Jun 17)
- Re: provider email maintenance standard Doug Royer (Jun 17)