nanog mailing list archives
Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:28:49 -0400
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:20:37 -0400, Prasun Dey said:
So, my question was more like to understand when an ISP decides to claim itself as any of these (Heavy Outbound/ Inbound or Balanced)? From an ISPâs own point of view, at what point, it says, my outbound:inbound is something, so Iâm Heavy Outbound.
Often, just "We're eyeballs, so heavily inbound" or similar quick estimation with no real numbers attached. Otherwise, often whatever the ISP's management thinks will give the best results when trying to convince another network to peer rather than have to pay for transit, or other similar reasons often only vaguely connected to reality.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP, (continued)
- RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP Steller, Anthony J (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Job Snijders (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Mark Tinka (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Mike Hammett (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Niels Bakker (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP Keith Medcalf (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Valdis Klētnieks (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)