nanog mailing list archives

Re: Analysing traffic in context of rejecting RPKI invalids using pmacct


From: Steve Meuse <smeuse () mara org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:17:22 -0400

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:26 AM Jay Borkenhagen <jayb () att com> wrote:



Thanks for the update, but based on that description I'm not certain
that you implemented the same thing that pmacct built, which IMO is
what is needed by those considering deploying a drop-invalids policy.
(Perhaps you omitted mentioning that ability in your description but
included it in your implementation.)


Thanks Jay, you are correct. As we were talking through the logic we
realized we missed that bit. Internally, we're working though the logic to
understand if there is a covering route, is that route valid, and if not,
will we recurse and look for another covering route that is valid?

Either way, we'll be updating our software with that functionality shortly.

-Steve

Current thread: