nanog mailing list archives
Re: well-known Anycast prefixes
From: Frank Habicht <geier () geier ne tz>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:49:30 +0300
Hi, On 20/03/2019 00:03, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Ok, so, just trying to flesh out the idea to something that can be usefully implemented… 1) People send an eBGP multi-hop feed of well-known-community routes to a collector, or send them over normal peering sessions to something that aggregates…
to clarify, eBGP multi-hop sounds good, that can be a dedicated session for this purpose, BGP communities probably don't need to be added. [for the case of 'normal peering sessions', it might seem "wasteful" to use an additional IP on multiple peering LANs] ...
Does that sound about right?
to me yes. Frank
Current thread:
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes, (continued)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Siyuan Miao (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Damian Menscher via NANOG (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Joe Provo (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Grzegorz Janoszka (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Frank Habicht (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Frank Habicht (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes James Shank (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Frank Habicht (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Job Snijders (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bryan Holloway (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Ross Tajvar (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bryan Holloway (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 21)