nanog mailing list archives
Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:40:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Bryan Holloway wrote:
And we are careful to ensure that any updates are pushed to all edge ingresses.
BGP-edge filters don't help with customer-to-customer packets within the same ISP BGP autonomous area. So you would need CPE customer-edge filters anyway. A small ISP might be able to handle individual customer filters on their backbone routers, but that way leads to insane network engineers.
See Barry Greene's page for the list of all the pro's & con's of different alternatives. There are very few new ideas, just new people rediscovering old ideas.
Current thread:
- Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering marcel.duregards--- via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Tom Hill (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Tom Beecher (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Bryan Holloway (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Saku Ytti (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Tom Beecher (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Jason Hellenthal via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Ca By (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Hansen, Christoffer (Mar 25)