nanog mailing list archives
RE: Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved?
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:41:13 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Aaron Gould wrote:
Why does cogent seem like the commonality between those 2 that you mentioned :|
Why do people think the policy as to whether or not they can peer or have to buy transit should be different for one address family vs the other?
Why will some networks peer at an IX but refuse to make changes (like new port IPs or new ASN for the same organization they already peer with)?
Regardless, this is why it pays to multi-home and peer as much as possible. If you directly peer with the networks one of your transit providers is in a pissing match with, the issue is easily ignored.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route | therefore you are _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? David Hubbard (Mar 28)
- Re: Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Jon Lewis (Mar 28)
- RE: Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Aaron Gould (Mar 29)
- RE: Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Jon Lewis (Mar 29)
- Re: Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Job Snijders (Mar 29)
- RE: Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Aaron Gould (Mar 29)
- Re: Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Jon Lewis (Mar 28)