nanog mailing list archives
Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved?
From: Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 20:24:00 -0500
On 3/31/19 8:21 PM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 18:10:09 -0700, Christopher Morrow said:Apologies, I do actually see a path from 174 -> 6939 (well 28 paths): 174 <many different 3-5 asn> 6939 <customer asn> it's clearly not all of HE -> Cogent, and it's clearly not supposed to be working (I would think).Wait, what? Are you saying that they refused to peer - and then failed at refusing? :)
Let them eat cake.
Current thread:
- Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? David Hubbard (Mar 28)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Matthew Petach (Mar 30)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Matthew Petach (Mar 30)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Christopher Morrow (Mar 31)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Christopher Morrow (Mar 31)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Mike Leber (Mar 31)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Jay Hennigan (Mar 31)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Matthew Petach (Mar 31)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Owen DeLong (Mar 31)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Matthew Petach (Mar 30)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Valdis Klētnieks (Mar 31)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Bryan Holloway (Mar 31)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Randy Bush (Mar 31)
- Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved? Matthew Petach (Mar 30)