nanog mailing list archives
Re: is dnswl dead?
From: Jose Manuel Vazquez Castro <bps.josemanuel11 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 00:55:17 -0500
And check first connectivity ping and telnet tcp ports 22 , 873 to ips destination's from your linuxbox: Record A rsync2.dnswl.org 139.162.192.198 142.44.243.216 Or use in the command directly the ip. You are behinds a router, proxy , Nat device. May cause problems or deny filter traffic. If share a Wireshark capture will see what's happens .. El vie., 3 de mayo de 2019 0:23, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> escribió:
% /usr/local/bin/rsync --times rsync2.dnswl.org::dnswl/bind-dnswl-nons.zone /var/dns/primary/org.dnswl rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (54) rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at io.c(785) [Receiver=3.1.3] this has been going on for a while. admins do not respond to email. and yes, i paid. would be a bummer. was useful. randy
Current thread:
- is dnswl dead? Randy Bush (May 02)
- Re: is dnswl dead? Jose Manuel Vazquez Castro (May 03)
- Re: is dnswl dead? Randy Bush (May 03)
- Re: is dnswl dead? Jose Manuel Vazquez Castro (May 03)
- Re: is dnswl dead? Christopher Morrow (May 03)
- Re: is dnswl dead? Valdis Klētnieks (May 03)
- Re: is dnswl dead? Jose Manuel Vazquez Castro (May 03)