nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP prefix filter list
From: Mike <mike-nanog () tiedyenetworks com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 10:20:58 -0700
On 5/15/19 7:26 AM, Dovid Bender wrote:
You have no idea how sad and true this is. On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:16 AM Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org <mailto:jlewis () lewis org>> wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2019, Mike Hammett wrote: > What is the most common platform people are using with such limitations? How long ago was it deprecated? One network's deprecated router is another network's new [bargain priced] core router. :)
This is very true. I picked up a nicely equipped juniper mx240 - waayyyy overkill for my current operation - for far, far cheaper than anything I could have otherwise afforded new. Absolutely killer could not be happier, and J has won a convert. But, I find this seems to be the thing - needing capacity/feature sets/etc just to be able to stand still, but not having the revenue stream to actually pay new for what these vendors want to charge for their gear/licenses/etc. Mike-
Current thread:
- Re: BGP prefix filter list, (continued)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Saku Ytti (May 30)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Robert Blayzor (May 30)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list William Herrin (May 30)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Robert Blayzor (May 30)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Robert Blayzor (May 30)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Brielle (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Antonios Chariton (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Jon Lewis (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Dovid Bender (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Mike (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Mark Tinka (May 16)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list mike . lyon (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Baldur Norddahl (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Mike Hammett (May 15)