nanog mailing list archives
Re: Disney+ Streaming
From: Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:15:03 -0600
Neither Good Omens nor Game of Thrones are available for streaming on Netflix (you'll have to go to one of their competitors). Overall I tend to agree with Brian that people's time and eyeballs are finite. As more streaming services emerge, usage will simply be split between streaming providers. There might be a slight increase in overall streaming usage due to the effect you mentioned (more content available for a wider audience than in previous years), but I don't expect it to be an overnight change for our industry.
Matthew Petach wrote on 11/12/2019 2:53 PM:
Different target audiences.Now the parents can be watching "Good Omens" or "Game of Thrones" on Netflix while the kids are streaming "The Lion King" on Disney+ streaming. Instead of the whole family watching one show together, now we have segmentation in the marketplace.End result is more total overall bandwidth consumption. MattOn Tue, Nov 12, 2019, 12:38 Brian J. Murrell <brian () interlinx bc ca <mailto:brian () interlinx bc ca>> wrote:On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 15:26 -0500, Valdis Klētnieks wrote: > > I can foresee a lot of families subscribing to Netflix *and* Disney+ > because neither one has all the content the family wants to watch. Absolutely. But the time spent watching Disney would *replace* (not be in addition to, or would it? Would Disney's content result in existing streamers watching more hours of streaming than they did before?) Netflix watching. > Has anybody seen a significant drop in total streaming traffic due to > Netflix > users jumping ship to Amazon/Hulu, or are consumers just biting the > bullet, > coughing up the $$, and streaming more total because across the > services > there's more stuff they want to watch? I actually suspect streaming is going to decline (at least in comparison to where it could have grown to) if this streaming service fragmentation continues. I think people are going to reject the idea that they need to subscribe to a dozen streaming services at $10-$20/mo. each and will be driven back the good old "single source" (piracy) they used to use before 1 (or perhaps 2) streaming services kept them happy enough to abandon piracy. The content providers are going to piss in their bed again due to greed. Again. Cheers, b.
Current thread:
- Re: Disney+ Streaming, (continued)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Eric Dugas (Nov 12)
- RE: Disney+ Streaming Aaron Gould (Nov 13)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Brian J. Murrell (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Michael Crapse (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Clayton Zekelman (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Brian J. Murrell (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Clayton Zekelman (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Eric Dugas (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Valdis Klētnieks (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Brian J. Murrell (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Matthew Petach (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Blake Hudson (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Mark Andrews (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Jared Mauch (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Brian J. Murrell (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Matthew Petach (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Brian J. Murrell (Nov 12)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Mike Bolitho (Nov 13)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Niels Bakker (Nov 13)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Bryan Holloway (Nov 13)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Mel Beckman (Nov 13)
- Re: Disney+ Streaming Stephen Satchell (Nov 13)