nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE our of IPv4
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:17:30 -0800
--- brandon () rd bbc co uk wrote: From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk> If you're an internet professional you are a negligent one if by now you are not ensuring all you build quietly includes IPv6, no customer should need to know to ask for it. It's not like it needs different kit. ----------------------------------------------------- No, it's just that (at least in my case at several different companies) we're so focused by management on getting the sale done by augmenting the existing network there is not enough time to devote to **planning an entire network from the ground up**, then working your plan. The other way (just start configuring stuff) is replete with troubles. BTW, I have been the IPv6 loudmouth every time, but I don't get any traction at all in any of the companies I've worked for. Eyes gloss over and someone quickly changes the conversation. Then we talk about sizing subnets and stuff... scott
Current thread:
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4, (continued)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Ca By (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Sabri Berisha (Nov 27)
- RE: RIPE our of IPv4 Michel Py (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Christian (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Ca By (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Christian (Nov 27)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mike Hammett (Nov 27)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 27)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 27)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 26)