nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:41:12 +0900
George Michaelson wrote:
Personally, I choose to favour continued deployment of IPv6.
With I sometimes wish I understood why SRC was the first element off the wire, and not DST, Since rational ASIC/FPGA hardware can latch early on the SRC and begin routing faster if it appears in natural bit order first. you are saying IPv4 is better than IPv6.
I do not favour the CGN v4 forever model,
As NAT can be modified in backward compatible manner to preserve E2E transparency, don't mind. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Hoppes (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Hoppes (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Alan Buxey (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment John Levine (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Seth Mattinen (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Naslund, Steve (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Palmer (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Naslund, Steve (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Alan Buxey (Oct 03)