nanog mailing list archives
Re: sfps from fs dot com
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 14:43:34 +0000
We buy them extensively and have had zero data problems with more than 300 parts in the field. Some switch/router manufacturers’ firmware poutily refuses to let you read snmp stats from any “unauthorized” SFPs modules, and some oem salespeople lyingly claim that using them voids your warranty, but this is just an attempt to keep customers captive to insanely overpriced OEM parts. FS.com’s bi-di modules are particularly ingenious, letting you add bidirectional fiber to devices the oem manufacture doesn’t even sell optics for in an attempt to create artificial product segmentation. -mel
On Sep 20, 2019, at 5:35 AM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:On Sep 20, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Nicholas Warren <nwarren () barryelectric com> wrote: Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?Yes.
Current thread:
- sfps from fs dot com Nicholas Warren (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jared Mauch (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Neil Hanlon (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Alain Hebert (Sep 23)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jared Mauch (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Kevin McCormick (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Chris Gross (Sep 20)