nanog mailing list archives

Re: sfps from fs dot com

From: Matthew Crocker <matthew () corp crocker com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 15:12:33 +0000


I have had some fail and SFP+ & QSFP28s that my Juniper MC480s refuse to recognize even though I ordered 'branded 
Juniper' optics.

99% of my stuff is from FlexOptix (https://www.flexoptix.net/).  They are a bit more expensive but I've had 100% 
reliability and they have worked in all systems I've put them in.



On 9/20/19, 8:33 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Nicholas Warren" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of nwarren () 
barryelectric com> wrote:

    Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?

Current thread:

Re: sfps from fs dot com, (continued)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
  - Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
    - Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
    - Re: sfps from fs dot com Neil Hanlon (Sep 20)
    - Re: sfps from fs dot com Alain Hebert (Sep 23)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Kevin McCormick (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Chris Gross (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Dennis Lundström (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Matthew Crocker (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Carl Peterson (Sep 20)
  - Re: sfps from fs dot com Nikolas Geyer (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Michel Py (Sep 20)