nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test
From: Andrey Kostin <ankost () podolsk ru>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:51:01 -0400
Jay R. Ashworth писал 2020-04-22 11:02:
Well, given how little the BCP38 website below has moved that football, you'renot likely in much danger... :-) Cheers, -- jra
BCP38 website doesn't proclaim anybody in person to be unsafe, but if it would be possible to make such test it'd be more useful than that RPKI test.
BTW, has anybody yet thought/looked into extending RPKI-RTR protocol for validation of prefixes received from peer-as to make ingress filtering more dynamic and move away prefix filters from the routers?
Kind regards, Andrey
Current thread:
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test, (continued)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Matt Corallo via NANOG (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Rubens Kuhl (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Matt Corallo via NANOG (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Danny McPherson (Apr 22)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Warren Kumari (Apr 22)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Matt Corallo via NANOG (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 22)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Danny McPherson (Apr 22)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Christopher Morrow (Apr 22)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Christopher Morrow (Apr 22)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 23)