nanog mailing list archives
Re: mail admins?
From: Matt Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:48:50 +1000
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 07:47:58PM -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 4/23/20 7:35 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:While I do think webauthn is a neat idea, and solves at least one very real problem (credential theft via phishing), you do an absolutely terrible job of making that case.see RFC 4876, it is not about phishing. not even a little bit. Never has been.
Whilst I do *absolutely* agree with you that "A Configuration Profile Schema for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)-Based Agents" is "not about phishing, not even a little bit", I'm not entirely sure how it advances your argument. - Matt
Current thread:
- Re: mail admins?, (continued)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Scott Weeks (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Matt Palmer (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? William Herrin (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? William Herrin (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Matt Palmer (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Matt Palmer (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 24)
- Re: mail admins? Bryan Holloway (Apr 24)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 24)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Raymond Burkholder (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 26)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 26)
- Re: mail admins? Matt Palmer (Apr 26)
- Re: mail admins? Michael Thomas (Apr 26)
- Re: mail admins? Matt Palmer (Apr 26)