nanog mailing list archives
Re: CGNAT Solutions
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:35:19 +0900
Brandon Martin wrote:
You can't get rid of all the state tracking without also having the CPE know which ports to use
If you mean getting rid of logging, not necessarily. It is enough if
CPEs are statically allocated ranges of external port numbers.
Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- CGNAT Solutions John Alcock (Apr 28)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Baldur Norddahl (Apr 28)
- RE: CGNAT Solutions Aaron Gould (Apr 28)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions William Herrin (Apr 28)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Brandon Martin (Apr 28)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Masataka Ohta (Apr 28)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Brandon Martin (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Masataka Ohta (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Ca By (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions William Herrin (Apr 29)
- Message not available
- Re: CGNAT Solutions William Herrin (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Brandon Martin (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Ca By (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Brandon Martin (Apr 28)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Masataka Ohta (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Ca By (Apr 29)