nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse Desks
From: Matt Corallo via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:46:32 -0400
I think we all agree with this. The requl question is...how do we build such a thing? The abuse process we have clearly doesn't work. Maybe its the fault of the Big Providers (AWS/GCP/OVH/etc) who don't invest enough to have a robust abuse-processing system to actually deal with reports, maybe its because people are too liberal with automated reports, maybe its because we don't have a common abuse report format. Either way, one thing I don't think we can deny is that the abuse system today is very, very broken. Abuse reports to the biggest offenders (ie Big Providers, mostly) get ignored and abuse is not dealt with. Matt On 4/29/20 1:42 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: -snip-
As long as there are things that must be available to the general public (likely forever), there needs to be an abuse reporting process that works.
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse Desks, (continued)
- Re: Abuse Desks Joe Greco (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Stephen Satchell (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Sabri Berisha (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Mel Beckman (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Sabri Berisha (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Mukund Sivaraman (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Stephen Satchell (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Mike Hammett (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Stephen Satchell (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Mike Hammett (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Matt Corallo via NANOG (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Mukund Sivaraman (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Tom Beecher (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Mukund Sivaraman (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Tom Beecher (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Laszlo Hanyecz (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Brian J. Murrell (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Mukund Sivaraman (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Mel Beckman (Apr 29)
- Re: Abuse Desks Matt Corallo via NANOG (Apr 29)