nanog mailing list archives

Re: 100g PCS Errors

From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:21:52 -0400

It's not normal, no.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:02 AM Nicholas Warren <nwarren () barryelectric com>
wrote:

We've got a 100g qsfp in an mx204 that has 1207 bit errors and 29666
errored blocks after 24 hours of just being linked up...
I would assume this is not normal behavior, but I haven't used 100g
before. Do others see high error rates on their 100g optics?

Current thread:

100g PCS Errors Nicholas Warren (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Aug 19)
  - Re: 100g PCS Errors Matt Harris (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Tom Beecher (Aug 19)
  - Re: 100g PCS Errors Aaron (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Clinton Work (Aug 19)
  - Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 19)
    - Re: 100g PCS Errors Saku Ytti (Aug 19)
    - Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 20)