nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 help
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 20:31:24 +0200
On 26/Aug/20 20:20, Brian Johnson wrote:
Either way. Nothing you can do in the network will help Sony enable IPv6 capability, Or to serve their users even if using a technology that they do not like.
Agreed. The problem is gaming customers that neither care for nor know about how NAT444 and/or IPv6 play (no pun intended) here. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 help, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- RE: Ipv6 help Tony Wicks (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)