nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990
From: Job Snijders <job () ntt net>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 13:53:19 +0000
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:36:25PM +0200, Alex Band wrote:
According to the information I received from the community[1], you should read PR1461602 and PR1309944 before deploying. [1] https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/rpki/router-support.html
My take on PR1461602 is that it can be ignored, as it appears to only manifest itself in a mostly cosmetic way: initial RTR session establishment takes multiple minutes, but once RTR sessions are up things work smoothly. Under no circumstances should you enable RPKI ROV functionality on boxes that suffer from PR1309944. That one is a real showstopper. Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990, (continued)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Hank Nussbacher (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Darrell Budic (Aug 02)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 02)
- RE: BGP route hijack by AS10990 adamv0025 (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Alex Band (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Job Snijders (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Baldur Norddahl (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Rich Kulawiec (Aug 27)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 03)