nanog mailing list archives
Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 01:37:45 +0300
Peace, On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 1:18 AM Octolus Development <admin () octolus net> wrote:
OVH are threatening to kick us off their network, because we are victims of this attack.
Most of the hosting companies will do that to you because you're causing degradation of service quality for other customers. Especially the lowcosters which even cut the costs of processing the abuse, and OVH is the world-renowned cost cutter. Look out for data centers with appropriate DDoS countermeasures. Those won't be cheap though. -- Töma
Current thread:
- TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Octolus Development (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Forest HQ Has Received Your Message: Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Filip Hruska (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Damian Menscher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Tom Beecher (Feb 21)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Bottiger (Feb 24)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Damian Menscher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Amir Herzberg (Feb 21)