nanog mailing list archives
Re: MAP-T in production
From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:28:41 +0100
On 22/07/2020 22:15, Brian Johnson wrote:
Has anyone implemented a MAP-T solution in production? I am looking for feedback on this as a deployment strategy for an IPv6 only core design. My concern is MAP-T CE stability and overhead on the network. The BR will have to do overloaded NAT anyway to access IPv4 only resources. The idea being that when IPv4 is no longer needed, this will be a quicker “clean-up” project than a dual-stack solution.
Richard Patterson did a talk about Sky Italia's 'greenfield' build at UKNOF45, earlier this year: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cg3dLR95wY Lots of interesting stuff in there, but the pertinent broadband termination parts - which go on to mentioning MAP-T - start at ~15:00. Regards, -- Tom
Current thread:
- MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Fred Baker (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Ca By (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Tom Hill (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Mark Tinka (Jul 26)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 27)
- Re: MAP-T in production Baldur Norddahl (Jul 27)
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Fred Baker (Jul 22)