nanog mailing list archives

Re: MAP-T in production


From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:28:41 +0100

On 22/07/2020 22:15, Brian Johnson wrote:
Has anyone implemented a MAP-T solution in production? I am looking
for feedback on this as a deployment strategy for an IPv6 only core
design. My concern is MAP-T CE stability and overhead on the network.
The BR will have to do overloaded NAT anyway to access IPv4 only
resources. The idea being that when IPv4 is no longer needed, this
will be a quicker “clean-up” project than a dual-stack solution.

Richard Patterson did a talk about Sky Italia's 'greenfield' build at
UKNOF45, earlier this year: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cg3dLR95wY

Lots of interesting stuff in there, but the pertinent broadband
termination parts - which go on to mentioning MAP-T - start at ~15:00.

Regards,

-- 
Tom


Current thread: