nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists?
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:30:58 +0100
Mark Tinka wrote on 29/07/2020 15:09:
Are the names based on DNS look-ups, or is there some kind of protocol association between the device underlay and its hostname, as it pertains to neighbors?
afaik, this is an implementation of draft-walton-bgp-hostname-capability. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists?, (continued)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Vincent Bernat (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Saku Ytti (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Saku Ytti (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Saku Ytti (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Douglas Fischer (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Mark Tinka (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Nick Hilliard (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Mark Tinka (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Nick Hilliard (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Mark Tinka (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Chriztoffer Hansen (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Nick Hilliard (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Mark Tinka (Jul 29)