nanog mailing list archives
Re: Partial vs Full tables
From: Robert Blayzor <rblayzor.bulk () inoc net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:25:16 -0400
On 6/4/20 11:00 PM, James Breeden wrote:
And before I get asked why not just run full tables, I'm looking at regional approaches to being able to use smaller, less powerful routers (or even layer3 switches) to run some areas of the network where we can benefit from summarization and full tables are really overkill.
One caveat that may or may not play into this is if you use uRPF (loose) on your transit links. -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net PGP: https://pgp.inoc.net/rblayzor/
Current thread:
- Re: Partial vs Full tables, (continued)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mike Hammett (Jun 06)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mike Hammett (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tom Beecher (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Ryan Rawdon (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Ryan Rawdon (Jun 06)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Alejandro Acosta (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Robert Blayzor (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Brian Johnson (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Chris Adams (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Robert Blayzor (Jun 11)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Jun 12)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables brad dreisbach (Jun 11)