nanog mailing list archives
Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 17:43:57 -0700
On Jun 20, 2020, at 2:27 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote: On 20/Jun/20 00:41, Anoop Ghanwani wrote:One of the advantages cited for SRv6 over MPLS is that the packet contains a record of where it has been.I can't see how advantageous that is, or how possible it would be to implement, especially for inter-domain traffic. Mark.
Since the packet is essentially source-routed, and the labels aren’t popped off the way they are in MPLS, but preserved in the hop by hop headers (AIUI), the implementation isn’t particularly difficult. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?, (continued)
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Tim Durack (Jun 19)
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? steve ulrich (Jun 19)
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 19)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Anoop Ghanwani (Jun 19)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Robert Raszuk (Jun 19)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Sabri Berisha (Jun 20)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 21)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Owen DeLong (Jun 20)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 17)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Saku Ytti (Jun 17)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 18)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Saku Ytti (Jun 18)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 18)