nanog mailing list archives

Re: why am i in this handbasket? (was Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?)


From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:47:53 +0200



On 22/Jun/20 16:30, adamv0025 () netconsultings com wrote:

Not quite,
The routing information is flooded by default, but the receivers will cherry
pick what they need and drop the rest. 
And even if the default flooding of all and dropping most is a concern -it
can be addressed where only the relevant subset of all the routing info is
sent to each receiver.
The key takeaway however is that no single entity in SP network, be it PE,
or RR, or ASBR...., ever needs everything, you can always slice and dice
indefinitely.
So to sum it up you simply can not run into any scaling ceiling with MP-BGP
architecture.   

The only nodes in our network that have ALL the NLRI is our RR's.

Depending on the function of the egress/ingress router, the RR sends it
only what it needs for its function.

This is how we get away using communities in lieu of VRF's :-).

And as Adam points out, those RR's will swallow anything and everything,
and still remain asleep.

Mark.


Current thread: