nanog mailing list archives
Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:38:53 +0200
On 25/Jun/20 16:45, Christian wrote:
wow. blaming support for IPv6 rather than using cgnat is a huge stretch of credibility
I have no idea what's going through Netflix's mind - it's all, as my American friend would say, conjecturbation on my part. CG-NAT isn't new, and if Netflix are still not able to consider it a "fixed issue", there is probably a reason why that is. Ultimately, reaching out to them and asking their position on the matter seems like a path to an answer. Mark.
Current thread:
- netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jun 25)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Mike Hammett (Jun 25)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Mark Tinka (Jun 25)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Christian (Jun 25)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Mark Tinka (Jun 25)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Brandon Jackson via NANOG (Jun 25)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Mark Tinka (Jun 26)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Gary E. Miller (Jun 26)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Mike Hammett (Jun 26)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Brandon Jackson via NANOG (Jun 26)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jun 26)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Sabri Berisha (Jun 26)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jun 26)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Sabri Berisha (Jun 27)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Mark Tinka (Jun 30)
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Christian (Jun 25)