nanog mailing list archives
Re: WIKI documentation Software?
From: Craig <cvuljanic () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:34:06 -0400
Lol, Sharepoint,,,. Arggg, yea NOT going to happen , We’ve managed to avoid using that. On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:50 AM Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas () gmail com> wrote:
Seconding Confluence. Stay away from Sharepoint. On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:09 AM Craig <cvuljanic () gmail com> wrote:Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to / how to's for staff, etc. pro's con's We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced before it kicks the bucket and was looking into various ones. thanks; CPV
Current thread:
- WIKI documentation Software? Craig (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Josh Baird (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Gavin Henry (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Karl Auer (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Brielle (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Bill Woodcock (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Yang Yu (Mar 15)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Grimes, Greg (Mar 15)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Andrew Latham (Mar 15)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Brielle (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Eric Kuhnke (Mar 17)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Josh Baird (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Craig (Mar 14)
- RE: WIKI documentation Software? Ray Orsini (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Anurag Bhatia (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Gavin Henry (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? nanog08 (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Adam Kennedy via NANOG (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Billy Crook (Mar 17)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Craig (Mar 17)