nanog mailing list archives
Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks
From: Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:16:43 -0700
Basically that. It's probably more streaming services that could crowd out what would be considered "mission critical" infrastructure. Maybe the Netflixs and Hulus of the world will limit 4K streaming or something along those lines. Basically cap resolution to 720p for the time being. - Mike Bolitho On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 1:06 AM Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com> wrote:
The impact of all these bored school kids on the networks due to gamingmight cause some issues. I know that if I'm working from home and my videoconferencing slows down because of someones gaming, I'm taking the necessary action (read, change some rules on my firewall). People are welcome to do whatever they want on their own networks. I just didn't get the suggestion that online gaming services would shut down. Or were you saying, Mike, that online gaming would crowd out other services and so "shut down" those other services? On Fri., Mar. 13, 2020, 21:42 Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:You don’t have kids, do you… They have the attention span of Koi these days. They’ll play most games for about 15 minutes or so before downloading the next one. (At least that’s been my observation of behavior among my GF’s daughter and her friends). Owen On Mar 13, 2020, at 20:31 , Darin Steffl <darin.steffl () mnwifi com> wrote: Playing games doesn't take much bandwidth. Downloading games does. So as long as everyone already has their games and there's no updates, playing the game is typically under 100 kbps which is negligible compared to streaming video which takes 1 to 25 mbps. On Fri, Mar 13, 2020, 8:52 PM Sabri Berisha <sabri () cluecentral net> wrote:Hi, I don't know where y'all live, but here in the SF Bay Area, pretty much all public and private schools have closed down. My school district (in Santa Clara County) will be closed until Spring Break. The impact of all these bored school kids on the networks due to gaming might cause some issues. I know that if I'm working from home and my videoconferencing slows down because of someones gaming, I'm taking the necessary action (read, change some rules on my firewall). Thanks, Sabri ----- On Mar 13, 2020, at 4:12 PM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com> wrote: I think under circumstances like this, I could definitely see some ofthe online based games shutting services down.How so? Signed, Someone who works for an online gaming company and has heard nothing of this. -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo () slabnet com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 2:52 PM Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho () gmail com> wrote:I think under circumstances like this, I could definitely see some of the online based games shutting services down. - Mike Bolitho On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 2:41 PM Ahmed Borno <amaged () gmail com> wrote:Its already happening in Italy, and now that schools are shutting down here as well, its going to get interesting: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-12/housebound-italian-kids-strain-network-with-fortnite-marathon The ultimate traffic test is coming, looking forward to hearing about it on this thread. Maybe its a good time to start a communication channel between content providers/gaming companies and ISPs/CDNs. On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:22 AM Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com> wrote:On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:46 PM g () 1337 io <lists () 1337 io> wrote:With talk of there being an involuntary statewide (WA) and then national quarantines (house arrest) for multiple weeks, has anyone put thought into the impacts of this on your networks if/when this comes to fruition? We're already pushing the limits with telecommuters / those that are WFH, but I can only imagine what things will look like with everyone stuck at home for any duration of time.People will turn to you and every other ISP hoping you keep them online. So besides demand issues, keeping your network up will be important to a whole lot of people. Rubens
Current thread:
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks, (continued)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 13)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Brian K Miller (Mar 13)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Rubens Kuhl (Mar 13)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Ahmed Borno (Mar 13)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Bolitho (Mar 13)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Hugo Slabbert (Mar 13)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Sabri Berisha (Mar 13)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Darin Steffl (Mar 13)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Hugo Slabbert (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Bolitho (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Clayton Zekelman (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Bolitho (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Clayton Zekelman (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Bolitho (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Rich Kulawiec (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Hugo Slabbert (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Alexandre Petrescu (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Alexandre Petrescu (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks bzs (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Rich Kulawiec (Mar 14)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Ahmed Borno (Mar 13)