nanog mailing list archives
Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:41:39 -0400 (EDT)
Proper planning prevents piss poor performance.“You go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time.”
When someone does the after-action report, that will need to be a topic then. Right now, we've need to work with what we've got.
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Tim Požár wrote:
They are so open ended, they are really useless. Not sure why they didn't issue this with a company affiliation, etc to nail it down to say credentials that the person may have with them.
Current thread:
- CISA critical infrastructure letters Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Tim Požár (Mar 25)
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Ben Cannon (Mar 25)
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Jeff Shultz (Mar 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Scott Weeks (Mar 25)
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Matt Erculiani (Mar 25)
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Todd Underwood (Mar 25)
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Danny McPherson (Mar 25)
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Matt Erculiani (Mar 25)
- Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters Tim Požár (Mar 25)