nanog mailing list archives
Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails
From: "Cummings, Chris" <ccummings () coeur com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:41:18 +0000
Now that you say that, I think you're right. I am referring specifically to the EX4650 and they are the cheesy type where the rear half of the rail stays screwed in to the rack and the front half of the rail is attached to the switch. I assume it is the same on the QFX since they are very similar platforms. Basically they are that annoying type between rack ears and sliding rails where the device can separate completely from the rails. chris On 3/30/20, 10:37, "NANOG on behalf of Chuck Anderson" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of cra () WPI EDU> wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 03:15:54PM +0000, Cummings, Chris wrote: > Juniper's ToR switches have slide in rails. They are a bit frustrating compared to Dell easy rails, but they do the trick. You can slide the switch in/out while attached securely to the rails? That is news to me and my QFX5k and QFX10k switches.
Current thread:
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails, (continued)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Chuck Anderson (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Chris Adams (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Chuck Anderson (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Tore Anderson (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Chuck Anderson (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Chuck Anderson (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Ethan O'Toole (Mar 30)
- Re: rack rails Tore Anderson (Mar 30)
- Re: rack rails Cummings, Chris (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Chuck Anderson (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Cummings, Chris (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Tore Anderson (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Nitzan Tzelniker (Mar 30)
- Re: [EXT] Re: rack rails Chuck Anderson (Mar 30)