Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

[Shane Ronan <shane () ronan-online com>]

Elad,

How do you expect to get elected when you are attacking the very people who
will be voting in the election?

Further, it would seem you have very little experience in actually
operating large scale networks, network equipment or softwarr. You do
realize that a LARGE number of devices on the Internet run operating
systems that are no longer vendor supported? So even if you could convince
ALL vendors to support IPV4+ (nearly impossible), how do you plan to solve
the devices I mentioned?Perhaps it's because you can't, and neither can
IPV6, except a subset of those devices already support IPV6, so there will
less devices left behind than with your solution.

The more you talk, the more uneducated you sound.

Shane



On Wed, May 13, 2020, 3:48 PM Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io> wrote:

> For you nothing will work.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2020 10:39 PM
> *To:* Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io>
> *Cc:* David Hubbard <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>; NANOG <
> nanog () nanog org>
> *Subject:* Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
>
>  Peace,
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020, 10:27 PM Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io> wrote:
>
> So you didn't even test the implementation and didn't create it - so why
> you are writing "As a matter of fact". Which fact ? any evidence ?
>
>
> No, Elad.  It is *you* who needs to prove that your concept works.  Unless
> you do it, it is wise (and generally acceptable in IETF and the likes) to
> assume it doesn't.
>
> So far, you haven't done so.
>
> Having said so, when it comes to your "anti-spoofing solution" (sic!), I
> even have dedicated certain time reviewing it and writing a response.
> Based on the concepts I've seen, I honestly wonder if you ever got the
> appropriate engineering degree.
>
> By the way, what you have published as your "biography" on the RIPE Exec
> Board candidate page doesn't quite help to sort out the latter statement.
>
> --
> Töma