nanog mailing list archives
Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive
From: Chuck Church <chuckchurch () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:41:18 -0400
You mean not everyone still looks up the classifications on mulletsgalore.com? Chuck On Wed, May 13, 2020, 7:54 PM Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2020 10:40:36 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko said:What about introducing some cache offloading, like CDN doing? (Google, Facebook, Netflix, Akamai, etc) I think it can be rolled pretty quickly, with minimum labor efforts, at least for heavy content.The thing is that if you're an 800 pound gorilla, you probably have enough things that would benefit from being cached to make it worthwhile. I'd expect that the Internet Archive is probably mostly long-tail hits with not much hot content. Has anybody modeled how much cache space would it take to significantly improve the bandwidth situation?
Current thread:
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive, (continued)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Jonah Edwards (May 13)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Ben Cannon (May 13)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Terrence Koeman (May 12)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Tim Požár (May 12)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Denys Fedoryshchenko (May 13)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Mark Delany (May 13)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Denys Fedoryshchenko (May 13)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Bill Woodcock (May 13)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Denys Fedoryshchenko (May 13)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Tim Požár (May 12)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Valdis Klētnieks (May 13)
- Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive Chuck Church (May 14)