nanog mailing list archives

Re: alternative to voip gateways


From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:57:35 +0200

That probably depends on your country. Here nothing less than 100 Mbps is
acceptable :-). Just pointing out that is not actually possible without
rebuilding.

To his original query I would suggest simply using CPEs with VoIP ports and
skip analog voice.

Regards,

Baldur


On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:03 PM Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:

Baldur,

According to Nick Edwards, the OP, the main application is voice, which
most any DSLAM will handle easily, and solve his IP PBX line consolidation
problem. Instead of physical lines into the PBX, he can use the integrated
DSLAM SIP calling capability as the IP PBX interface. Given that only some
of the 1700 lines will be in use simultaneously, that amounts to very
little bandwidth.

Data capacity of 10 or 20 Mbps in this environment would be pure gravy,
and 100 Mbps is almost certainly not expected, or needed, for "worker
huts". I'm assuming the workers are not all tele-surgeons .🙂

 -mel
------------------------------
*From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl <
baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
*Sent:* Thursday, May 7, 2020 12:55 PM
*To:* nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org>
*Subject:* Re: alternative to voip gateways



On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:05 PM Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net>
wrote:

On 5/7/20 12:03 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
In the OP’s case however, the copper plant is private, and wholly owned
and already in operation. So surely in that situation fiber would be much
more expensive to dig and trench.

Indeed, I was responding to Ohta's comments regarding copper vs. fiber.
In this case, using DSL over the existing plant seems like a slam dunk
unless very high speeds are needed or the plant is in very poor condition.
Modern VDSL/2 DSLAMs are relatively inexpensive and will push 100Mbps over
surprising distances with essentially seamless fallback to ADSL2+ at
~24Mbps for long-reach situations.
--


Actually we are told the distances are between 300 meters and 1600 meters.
1700 loops all from a single point. That is going to suck. There will be no
vectoring and VDSL speeds starts to drop fast after 500 meters. There is
going to be a ton of crosstalk.

If you want to deliver 100 Mbps you will need to rebuild the copper plant
such that you isolate bundles of 192 loops in nearby cabinets. You need to
build fiber and power out there. You need to invest in multiple decentral
DSLAMs.

Regards,

Baldur




Current thread: