nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export-to" marker - Any ASN reserved to "export-only-to"?'


From: Robert Raszuk via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:21:04 +0200

Mark,

Nope .. it is the other way around.

It is all easy if you look from your network centric view.

But if I am connected to 10 ISPs in each POP I have to build 10 different
egress policies, each embedding custom policy, teach NOC to understand it
etc...

I think if there is a defined way to express prepend N times to my ISP
peers across all uplinks or lower local pref in my ISP network in a same
way to group of ISPs I see the value.

Best Regards,
R.


On Wed, Sep 9, 2020, 06:36 Mark Tinka via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:



On 8/Sep/20 23:22, Douglas Fischer via NANOG wrote:

Exactly Mike!

The Idea would be to define some base levels, to make the creations of
route-filtering simpler to everyone in the world.
And what comes beyond that, is in charge of each autonomous system.

It would make the scripting and templates easier and would avoid
fat-fingers.


Are we saying that what individual operators design for their own networks
is "complicated", and that coalescing around a single "de facto" standard
would simplify that?

Mark.


Current thread: