nanog mailing list archives

RE: SRv6

From: <aaron1 () gvtc com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 19:01:31 -0500

You might be on to something, but I'm unsure... are you suggesting that it's
any less private over SRv6 than it was over MPLS ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:12 PM
To: aaron1 () gvtc com
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: SRv6

I'm still learning, but, It does seem interesting that the IP layer
(v6) can now support vpn's without mpls.


as the packet payload is nekkid cleartext, where is the P in vpn?

Current thread:

Re: SRv6, (continued)
- - - Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 15)
    - RE: SRv6 aaron1 (Sep 15)
    - Re: SRv6 Saku Ytti (Sep 15)
    - Re: SRv6 Nick Hilliard (Sep 15)
    - Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
    - Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
    - Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 15)
    - Re: SRv6 Jeff Tantsura (Sep 15)
    - Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 15)
    - Re: SRv6 Jeff Tantsura (Sep 15)
    - RE: SRv6 aaron1 (Sep 15)
    - Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 15)
    - Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
    - Re: SRv6 Anoop Ghanwani (Sep 16)
    - Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 16)
    - Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
    - Re: SRv6 mark seery (Sep 17)
    - Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
    - Re: SRv6 mark seery (Sep 17)
    - Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
    - Re: SRv6 tim () pelican org (Sep 18)

(Thread continues...)