nanog mailing list archives
Re: SRv6
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:53:51 -0400
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:24:36 +0200, Mark Tinka said:
On 17/Sep/20 17:56, mark seery wrote:Perhaps all the more reason why end-to-end encryption should be part of the buyer beware conversation (not arguing against operator encryption in saying that - privacy is something everyone in I[C]T has to think about today).If gubbermints mandate that l2vpn's and l3vpn's be encrypted, the cloud bags will simply take over (not that they haven't, already).
Are there any actual countries heading that way? Seems like most of them insist they have the ability to snoop unencrypted traffic (where "crypto that has a baked-in back door" counts as unencrypted).
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: SRv6, (continued)
- Re: SRv6 Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 19)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 20)
- Re: SRv6 Łukasz Bromirski (Sep 21)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 James Bensley (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Paul Timmins (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 James Bensley (Sep 18)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 18)
- Re: SRv6 Tom Hill (Sep 21)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 21)