nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 15:45:40 -0700
On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 8:26 AM Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:
This doesn’t sound good, no matter how you slice it. The lack of transparency with a civilian resource is troubling at a minimum.
You do understand that the addresses in question are not and have never been "civilian." They came into DoD's possession when this was all still a military project funded by what's now DARPA. Personally, I think we may have an all time record for the largest honeypot ever constructed. I'd love to be a fly on that wall. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mike Hammett (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mike Hammett (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mike Hammett (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mike Hammett (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Jason Biel (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong via NANOG (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Carlos M. Martinez (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Christopher Morrow (Apr 27)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Apr 27)