nanog mailing list archives

Re: "Tactical" /24 announcements


From: Amir Herzberg <amir.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:17:11 -0400

On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:43 PM Hank Nussbacher <hank () interall co il>
wrote:

On 12/08/2021 17:59, William Herrin wrote:

If you prune the routes from the Routing Information Base instead, for
any widely accepted size (i.e. /24 or shorter netmask) you break the
Internet.

How does this break the Internet?  I would think it would just result in
sub-optimal routing (provided there is a covering larger prefix) but
everything should continue to work.  Clue me in, please.


Hi Hank, I think you're right, it could result in sub-optimal routing and
in particular, in your AS not being used for these subprefixes (the traffic
will go instead to a competing provider who sent the subprefix), hence, as
you said, sub-optimal routing.

I think some people (maybe Bill included) may consider the resulting harm
to routing to be sufficiently severe to consider this `breaking'. It
becomes a judgement call, I guess.

Cheers, Amir


-Hank



Current thread: