nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:39:59 +0100
Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> writes:
Please explain to me how you uniquely number 40M endpoints with RFC-1918 without running out of addresses and without creating partitioned networks. If you can’t, then I’m not the one making excuses.
You added "without ..." and did not explain why. This does look a bit like an excuse to me. But there is probably some explanation I don't see. Why would you not partition the network? Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bjørn Mork (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Jim Shankland (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tim Howe (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tom Beecher (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space Christopher Morrow (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)