nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:53:56 -0800
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 6:13 AM Izaac <izaac () setec org> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:38:00AM -0800, William Herrin wrote:None whatsoever. You just have to be really big.Hi Beel,
That was unnecessary. Sorry I used an S instead of a Z.
Thanks for backing me up with an example of an organization with competent network engineering. Their ability to almost infinitely leverage the existing rfc1918 address space to serve an appreciable fraction of all Internet attached hosts is a real demonstration of the possible.
Except they don't. One of the reasons you can't put vms in multiple regions into the same VPC is they don't have enough IP addresses to uniquely address the backend hosts in every region. They end up with a squirrelly VPC peering thing they relies on multiple gateway hosts to overcome the address partitioning from overlapping RFC1918. In other words, it proves the exact opposite of your assertion. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space bzs (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Eric Kuhnke (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Fred Baker (Feb 09)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space scott (Feb 13)
- RE: DoD IP Space Mark Foster (Feb 13)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 14)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 14)