nanog mailing list archives

Re: DoD IP Space


From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 07:26:57 -0800

I recently had a discussion with an Asian ISP that was asking the IETF to PLEASE re-declare DoD space to be private 
space so that they could use it. This particular ISP uses IPv6 extensively (a lot of their services are in fact 
IPv6-only) but has trouble with its enterprise customers. Frankly, enterprise use of IPv6 is a problem; they seem to 
push back pretty hard against using IPv6.

I find this thread highly appropriate.

On Jan 20, 2021, at 6:58 AM, j k <jsklein () gmail com> wrote:

My question becomes, what level of risk are these companies taking on by using the DoD ranges on their internal 
networks? And have they quantified the costs of this outage against moving to IPv6?

Joe Klein
"inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene 1)
"I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been." -- Wayne Gretzky
"I never lose. I either win or learn" - Nelson Mandela



On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:06 AM John Curran <jcurran () istaff org> wrote:
Indeed.
/John

On Jan 20, 2021, at 8:47 AM, Cynthia Revström <me () cynthia re> wrote:

But if you do this, make sure you keep track of where you might have put policies like this in, in case the DoD 
sells some the space or whatever in the future.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


Current thread: