nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:22:24 -0800
I’m sure we all remember Y2k (well, most of us, there could be some young-uns on the list). That day was happening whether we wanted it to or not. It was an unchangeable, unmovable deadline.but i thought 3gpp was gong to force ipv6 adoption
let me try it a different way why should i care whether you deploy ipv6, move to dual stack, cgnat, ...? you will do whatever makes sense to the pointy heads in your c suite. why should i give them or some tech religion free rent in my mind when i already have too much real work to do? randy
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space surfer (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Jan 22)
- RE: DoD IP Space Travis Garrison (Jan 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Jan 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space surfer (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Valdis Klētnieks (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Jan 23)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Dorn Hetzel (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bryan Fields (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Brandon Martin (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Eric Kuhnke (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bryan Fields (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Eric Kuhnke (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Jan 20)